Information on Result #470927

There is no (87, 171, 221)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3068 350693 082351 777703 878332 103193 786329 642918 201740 > 2171

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (87, 172, 221)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction