Information on Result #470931

There is no (95, 171, 288)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3201 233874 886852 984763 990944 215489 145005 001880 812872 > 2171

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (95, 172, 288)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction