Information on Result #470931
There is no (95, 171, 288)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3201 233874 886852 984763 990944 215489 145005 001880 812872 > 2171
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (95, 172, 288)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |