Information on Result #470980

There is no (84, 172, 201)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6658 028850 661793 584499 399774 633969 678093 984106 044400 > 2172

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (84, 173, 201)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction