Information on Result #470984
There is no (92, 172, 256)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6117 826162 516563 187482 678629 465237 640631 086804 174345 > 2172
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (92, 173, 256)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |