Information on Result #471001
There is no (126, 172, 1648)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6020 887781 073811 759675 758204 428450 250378 000292 930118 > 2172
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (126, 173, 1648)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |