Information on Result #471001

There is no (126, 172, 1648)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6020 887781 073811 759675 758204 428450 250378 000292 930118 > 2172

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (126, 173, 1648)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction