Information on Result #471039
There is no (95, 173, 280)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12761 082508 965911 771765 401292 828939 803182 981652 457592 > 2173
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (95, 174, 280)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |