Information on Result #471095

There is no (96, 174, 286)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 25767 481140 254361 886260 220267 475849 107269 748266 237504 > 2174

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 175, 286)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction