Information on Result #471095
There is no (96, 174, 286)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 25767 481140 254361 886260 220267 475849 107269 748266 237504 > 2174
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (96, 175, 286)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |