Information on Result #471099

There is no (104, 174, 387)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 23969 189423 289676 335822 594747 589748 892063 313586 601976 > 2174

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (104, 175, 387)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction