Information on Result #471100

There is no (106, 174, 422)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 24328 982970 089978 007172 171182 018989 734613 676283 043514 > 2174

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (106, 175, 422)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction