Information on Result #471119

There is no (144, 174, 19918)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 23953 782792 218234 655395 406014 176154 034332 826945 954268 > 2174

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (144, 175, 19918)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction