Information on Result #471192

There is no (68, 176, 133)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 111574 401682 111530 528719 332582 763435 636480 521089 792416 > 2176

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (68, 177, 133)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction