Information on Result #471201

There is no (86, 176, 205)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 95921 609384 288854 316253 927123 066434 227647 592964 833860 > 2176

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (86, 177, 205)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction