Information on Result #471202

There is no (88, 176, 217)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 97592 358721 932449 530859 281398 523875 470014 469508 567800 > 2176

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (88, 177, 217)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction