Information on Result #471223

There is no (130, 176, 1863)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 95852 525629 565723 579931 606724 153454 857053 613307 997832 > 2176

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (130, 177, 1863)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction