Information on Result #471260

There is no (93, 177, 250)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 212724 312941 805803 201477 533689 723274 190956 079120 752336 > 2177

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (93, 178, 250)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction