Information on Result #471302
There is no (64, 178, 122)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 476821 207888 097716 025737 566871 130674 956426 822268 495833 > 2178
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (64, 179, 122)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |