Information on Result #471304
There is no (68, 178, 132)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 417898 255887 995481 577330 050921 941333 889985 404167 897312 > 2178
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (68, 179, 132)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |