Information on Result #471322

There is no (104, 178, 360)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 404944 552818 026750 305302 453909 388596 033412 310315 359053 > 2178

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (104, 179, 360)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction