Information on Result #471322
There is no (104, 178, 360)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 404944 552818 026750 305302 453909 388596 033412 310315 359053 > 2178
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (104, 179, 360)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |