Information on Result #471323
There is no (106, 178, 389)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 383205 151990 649033 124966 576540 633258 321583 365930 731700 > 2178
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (106, 179, 389)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |