Information on Result #471336

There is no (132, 178, 1981)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 384189 318963 823002 480410 752368 395211 119010 871468 258984 > 2178

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (132, 179, 1981)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction