Information on Result #471359
There is no (65, 179, 124)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 890119 096309 908341 465994 075105 390329 686011 935153 242619 > 2179
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (65, 180, 124)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |