Information on Result #471360

There is no (67, 179, 129)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 850588 123598 474743 335236 400519 497652 291940 473281 030480 > 2179

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (67, 180, 129)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction