Information on Result #471415

There is no (64, 180, 121)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 611506 763534 866217 037619 604100 355339 540062 621337 948508 > 2180

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (64, 181, 121)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction