Information on Result #471416

There is no (66, 180, 126)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 649288 650146 495658 991449 404301 196271 382052 497638 782687 > 2180

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (66, 181, 126)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction