Information on Result #471417

There is no (68, 180, 131)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 535951 057067 011553 324560 324263 077460 997291 058046 459024 > 2180

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (68, 181, 131)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction