Information on Result #471427

There is no (88, 180, 210)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 644100 042908 754838 418740 097809 021436 070752 163681 635600 > 2180

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (88, 181, 210)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction