Information on Result #471429
There is no (92, 180, 235)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 654474 227366 054519 199351 569703 473095 469569 741324 402200 > 2180
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (92, 181, 235)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |