Information on Result #471429

There is no (92, 180, 235)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 654474 227366 054519 199351 569703 473095 469569 741324 402200 > 2180

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (92, 181, 235)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction