Information on Result #471432

There is no (98, 180, 283)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 723880 581866 641710 430911 549779 400898 816659 383377 103840 > 2180

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (98, 181, 283)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction