Information on Result #471473

There is no (65, 181, 124)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 4 172674 251747 074945 711274 718132 138528 119977 533245 375793 > 2181

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (65, 182, 124)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction