Information on Result #471485

There is no (89, 181, 214)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 271150 538239 330098 670875 602715 935177 100231 597183 598800 > 2181

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 182, 214)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction