Information on Result #471488

There is no (95, 181, 254)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 189856 671797 829789 848324 397987 392047 150177 443199 544898 > 2181

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (95, 182, 254)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction