Information on Result #471490

There is no (99, 181, 288)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 162654 387371 884515 720854 925241 290817 532490 695337 593256 > 2181

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (99, 182, 288)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction