Information on Result #471531

There is no (66, 182, 126)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 793886 354753 481702 018540 510534 865726 642568 515338 834874 > 2182

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (66, 183, 126)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction