Information on Result #471544

There is no (92, 182, 231)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 030366 636848 093456 042903 577982 643900 812926 459827 559328 > 2182

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (92, 183, 231)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction