Information on Result #471636

There is no (161, 183, 500087)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12 260222 091463 089622 562142 315282 771543 354089 870449 568804 > 2183

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (161, 184, 500087)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction