Information on Result #471662

There is no (96, 184, 254)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27 116971 617726 123645 755789 886150 798563 812569 160302 156147 > 2184

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 185, 254)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction