Information on Result #471681

There is no (134, 184, 1636)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 24 794482 279995 471308 677052 282246 878109 045266 437208 660612 > 2184

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (134, 185, 1636)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction