Information on Result #471737

There is no (129, 185, 1061)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 49 514793 551796 964505 846060 679690 368368 258782 972141 235572 > 2185

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (129, 186, 1061)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction