Information on Result #471755

There is no (165, 185, 1678911)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 49 040085 699362 877803 654943 896749 452669 742512 925735 637743 > 2185

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 186, 1678911)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction