Information on Result #471755
There is no (165, 185, 1678911)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 49 040085 699362 877803 654943 896749 452669 742512 925735 637743 > 2185
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (165, 186, 1678911)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |