Information on Result #471796

There is no (128, 186, 953)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 98 284170 470083 239487 893700 192215 705406 835544 880617 189680 > 2186

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 187, 953)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction