Information on Result #471836

There is no (91, 187, 215)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 202 014107 047109 244680 710147 036570 569219 375187 988736 706110 > 2187

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (91, 188, 215)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction