Information on Result #471871

There is no (161, 187, 121211)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 196 178309 626380 166230 787160 165422 739459 347818 088874 661264 > 2187

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (161, 188, 121211)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction