Information on Result #471873

There is no (165, 187, 643448)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 196 160282 670009 129575 861677 217926 497677 904575 422619 278734 > 2187

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 188, 643448)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction