Information on Result #471978

There is no (135, 189, 1359)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 786 644800 568374 130735 291543 306040 597240 819500 433199 623304 > 2189

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (135, 190, 1359)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction