Information on Result #471991

There is no (161, 189, 70023)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 784 767774 597294 531965 277827 426554 496362 813060 491083 481264 > 2189

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (161, 190, 70023)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction