Information on Result #471992

There is no (163, 189, 134853)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 784 698825 326479 597972 885644 945315 609364 631262 197721 068592 > 2189

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (163, 190, 134853)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction