Information on Result #472018

There is no (94, 190, 227)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1594 100626 026105 397543 670418 916491 517577 468160 103287 256900 > 2190

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (94, 191, 227)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction