Information on Result #472019

There is no (96, 190, 240)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1754 791845 295234 450225 329705 679049 994268 944212 682528 311389 > 2190

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 191, 240)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction