Information on Result #472020

There is no (98, 190, 253)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1613 547621 776236 058714 049079 657924 119194 373050 827301 700908 > 2190

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (98, 191, 253)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction