Information on Result #472035

There is no (128, 190, 825)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1617 403800 139914 962798 034290 158261 160049 181525 128985 674624 > 2190

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 191, 825)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction